Having been associated with US Lacrosse for many years and having been appreciative of their guidance as they advocate for the growth of the sport of lacrosse, I understand how much time and research they put into their decisions. Thus, from the outset of this article, I want to be clear that I admire and respect US Lacrosse and appreciate their efforts and guidance. Many decisions are made for the greater good and will inevitably render some unwanted consequences. The US Lacrosse age segmentation policy effective 9/1/2017 is a clear example.
US Lacrosse this year transitioned away this year for the under age categorization to an age and under categorization. For example, the old U15 age bracket which would have represented players that were under the age of 15 as of the US Lacrosse cut off date of 8/31/2017 is now 14U with the new cut off date of 9/1/2017. Under the U15 categorization, 15 year old athletes could play youth ball provided that they turned 15 after the cut off date. In the 14U classification, 15 year old players are now eliminated from youth lacrosse eligibility.
I understand the intent here, which is to establish age categories that correspond more closely with the grade most kids fall into in a given age bracket, and in the case of the 14U division, this generally prohibits any high school freshmen from participating in youth lacrosse, making 8th grade the final year that a player may participate in youth lacrosse.
For long established lacrosse markets like my childhood state of New Jersey and other areas like New York, Maryland, etc., this does not generally present any challenges since most of these areas have thriving middle school, JV, and Varsity programs. However, in my adopted home state of Florida and particularly the Florida Space Coast where the sport is still very much in emerging market phase, we are facing difficulties at the 14U division and its enforcement.
One of the most pressing concerns is that we have several counties that do not have middle school athletic teams and high school programs that do not have enough players to field JV teams. This translates to still prepubescent and/or still developmental freshmen either being promoted to varsity or not playing at all. Such a move puts such a player in physical danger often pitting a young player who is essentially a boy or girl against young men or women. It also stifles lacrosse skill development for players who struggle just to physically keep up with far more developed athletes that they should have no business going up against.
Another issue is players that have been held back a year for academic reasons. Although a player may be in 8th grade, he/she will likely be ineligible to play youth lacrosse, yet he/she cannot play JV because he/she is not a member of the high school. On the flip side, there are academically gifted players that have skipped a grade which would make such a player a high school freshmen, still youth age eligible, but deemed ineligible for youth lacrosse due to school year.
These are all of the issues we are facing in our lacrosse county rec league here in the Florida Space Coast, the Brevard Lacrosse Alliance. I know that we are not alone in the state of Florida, hearing the issue raised among colleagues all over the state. I am certain that other states that are still emerging lacrosse markets are in similar predicaments.
Thankfully, US Lacrosse at this time provides these guidelines as exactly that: guidelines. At this time, I have been assured by US Lacrosse, that tweaking the guidelines for the unique needs of the individual programs will not at this time affect our liability concerns as it pertains to program insurance obtained via US Lacrosse. Also, this really is only an issue at the 14U level and seems to work just fine for all younger divisions.
Our ultimate policy in being a club that feels strongly about following US Lacrosse guidelines as closely as we possibly can, is that we intend to follow US Lacrosse guidelines for every division with the exception of our oldest youth division. Our policy is to enforce the 14U age bracket with exceptions for the allowance of 15U age eligible freshmen that are not concurrently on a JV or varsity roster.
Enforcement may prove challenging as our league grows, but by the time that becomes an issue, we are hopeful that with the growth of our numbers and more high school programs having thriving JV programs, the 14U age classification will no longer be as much of an issue.
We remain grateful for US Lacrosse and their national leadership in the sport of lacrosse. We are also grateful for the flexibility in transitioning to strive to meet their guidelines. A lot of smart people with countless years of experience in the sport of lacrosse and sports science that work for US Lacrosse constantly debate these issues which gives us tremendous respect for their adopted policies.
Dr. Roger Welton is a practicing veterinarian and well regarded media personality through a number of topics and platforms. In addition to being passionate about integrative veterinary medicine for which he is a nationally renowned expert, Dr. Welton was also an accomplished college lacrosse player and remains to this day very involved in the sport. He is president of Maybeck Animal Hospital , runs the successful veterinary/animal health blogs Web-DVM and Dr. Roger’s Holistic Veterinary Care, and fulfills his passion for lacrosse through his lacrosse and sport blog, The Creator’s Game.